Skip to content
Main Street Plaza

A Community for Anyone Interested in Mormonism.

Main Street Plaza

A Community for Anyone Interested in Mormonism.

In addition to touring the temple…

aerin64, January 13, 2009January 13, 2009

I heard this story on Friday on NPR.

I support the Utah LDS church’s movement towards openness and honesty.

I admit, this effort seems a little like a drop in the ocean. Yet I have to acknowledge the attempt. One of the comments Quentin Cook made was that they were “surprised” by the reaction from the public during Romney’s campaign and with prop. 8. While I respect some of the surprise, I can’t say I’m shocked by the secretive perception that many non LDS have. Even some active LDS I know are shocked to find out certain things about their religion’s history and its doctrine. It’s easy to not take the pulse of current cultural opinion and trends when you live not “of the world” and spend most of your time in an office building in Salt Lake City (surrounded by yes men). Many active and former LDS (throughout the world) could give the leadership lots of input about choices and attitudes that could be adjusted. But I digress.

One thing that would lead to greater openness would be full financial disclosure. This would mean that each person or ward could understand exactly where their tithing funds were being spent. Also – any investments or business that are owned or operated by LDS Inc. would be disclosed.

I mentioned this proposal before, in this post My Legislative Suggestion that will never go anywhere. I think it’s important for members of an organization to feel like they have a voice. That they understand what the organization (that they are members of) is doing and spending their money on. Considering the ongoing debacle over Prop. 8, this type of disclosure is even more important. I paid tithing as a child. I have no idea where that money was spent or where it went. It could have supported the upkeep on the church building. It could have paid for imported wood and gold inlay on a new temple. In the end – I have no idea. And members who contribute thousands of dollars per year also have no idea.

What other suggestions can you think of to dispel the secret nature of the Utah LDS church? I’m thinking of suggestions in addition to finances and an open and frank discussion of the past?

Priesthood Public Relations Tithing

Post navigation

Previous post
Next post

Related Posts

A Convert’s Conscience

January 18, 2009January 15, 2011

Although he appears to be a star professor at BYU, I have only become aware of Robert Millet’s efforts during the last two years. As a convert, I have to admit that his approach to investigators distresses me somewhat. I know that Millet means well when he suggests to side…

Read More

The Priesthood, Power, and the Rule of Law

April 20, 2008February 15, 2021

In light of the sensationalist press coverage of Mormon fundamentalism, the LDS Church is eager to disassociate itself from more traditional forms of Mormonism. Whatever the historical and theological relationship between mainstream and fundamentalist Mormonism may be, there is, of course, a big difference between the LDS and the FLDS…

Read More

Transcript of Boyd Packer’s Address at Multi-Stake Conference

October 31, 2007January 15, 2011

Editorial Note: I have previously reported about rumors of Boyd Packer’s and Gordon Hinckley’s response to criticism of Julie Beck’s conference address, which has not only been discussed with a variety of points of view on the Bloggernacle and the DAMU but also by readers posting on the websites of…

Read More

Comments (7)

  1. Hellmut says:
    January 13, 2009 at 11:20 am

    Financial disclosure would be the single most effective reform of Mormonism. A little accountability would go a long way to stabilize the LDS Church.

    Of course, the brethren won’t do it voluntarily but it would be good for their institution. The government saved the Church from itself during reconstruction and the new deal.

    May be, that needs to happen again.

  2. rebecca says:
    January 13, 2009 at 12:10 pm

    I think making the temple rites known and not wearing weird underwear with secret symbols would make people a lot less wary of them. Of course, the secrecy of those things is so central to the practices of the church that…not going to happen. And I wouldn’t expect it to, or really care if it did. I just think people wouldn’t be so weirded out by the Mormons if they talked about “sacred” things.

    My brother stopped paying tithing, and instead buys books and donates them with that money. I think that’s a FANTASTIC idea.

  3. Andrew S says:
    January 13, 2009 at 5:22 pm

    I remember reading an article about a former member (or maybe she was still a member) who went to a…:( I’m sorry, I don’t remember the details…well, she had gone to another church and was kinda amazed that they were deliberated openly about what kind of language they should use for some proposal they were doing…it was a relatively open meeting where women — and not just men — were allowed to input.

    Well, I pretty much botched that synopsis up, getting rid of any details that could help anyone find this story, but that’s what this post reminded me of.

  4. aerin says:
    January 13, 2009 at 6:31 pm

    Andrew #3- a business meeting?

    I have to say, there is a point where some (only some) discussions about language and the language used get a little redundent. But I won’t disagree that some terms are limiting.

    I would say – I’ve found amazing openness in almost every organization I’ve been in since LDS, Inc. – including the publicly traded company I currently work for. And that’s saying a lot.

  5. Hellmut says:
    January 13, 2009 at 9:14 pm

    In terms of centralization of power, the LDS Church is an extreme, at least in the western world. We are even more authoritarian than the Roman Catholic Church, which is quite an accomplishment.

  6. chanson says:
    January 14, 2009 at 10:56 am

    I think making the temple rites known and not wearing weird underwear with secret symbols would make people a lot less wary of them.

    I though that knowing what’s in the temple rites makes them seem more weird. If you don’t know, you can give them the benefit of the doubt that their secret ritual is actually something really cool…

  7. rebecca says:
    January 14, 2009 at 11:33 am

    chanson — Well, yeah, that’s true. They do kind of make people get squinchy eyed. But the fact that they REFUSE to answer any questions or talk about it I think really weirds people out. Then when people eventually do find out what goes on (if they care enough to look into it), they’re even more weirded out. If people had explained it in the first place I think it would often come off as more quirky than weird. I mean, no one has a real problem with nuns and priests wearing crazy clothes and being chaste for life (in theory, anyway). The difference is that they’re public about it.

    Not that I think Mormons should start wearing their underwear on the outside or anything…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Mormon Alumni Association Books

Latest Comments:

  1. Donna Banta on A pox on the PoX policy, ten years onNovember 5, 2025

    If Oaks meant to imply anything by picking a counselor with a gay brother it was, "See, we can hate…

  2. @Monya_PostMo on A pox on the PoX policy, ten years onNovember 5, 2025

    See post and comments at Latter Gay Stories - heartbreaking! No loving God was involved in that policy https://www.facebook.com/search/top?q=latter%20gay%20stories

  3. chanson on A pox on the PoX policy, ten years onNovember 5, 2025

    I remember when the PoX was rolled out, and the tales of its horrible effects. So, now I guess same…

  4. @Monya_PostMo on A pox on the PoX policy, ten years onNovember 5, 2025

    Oaks reasoned that if preference wasn't built into the law, all of society could move toward homosexual marriage and could…

  5. MikeyB on on “American Trinity”November 4, 2025

    Awesome post! Really enjoyed reading it.

8: The Mormon Proposition Acceptance of Gays Add new tag Affirmation angry exmormon awards Book Reviews BYU comments Conformity Dallin H. Oaks DAMU disaffected mormon underground Dustin Lance Black Ex-Mormon Exclusion policy Excommunicated exmormon faith Family feminism Gay Gay Love Gay Marriage Gay Relationships General Conference Happiness Homosexual Homosexuality LDS LGBT LGBTQ Link Bomb missionaries Modesty Mormon Mormon Alumni Association Mormonism motherhood peace politics Polygamy priesthood ban Sunstone temple

Awards

William Law X-Mormon of the Year:

  • 2023: Adam Steed
  • 2022: David Archuleta
  • 2021: Jeff T. Green
  • 2020: Jacinda Ardern
  • 2019: David Nielsen
  • 2018: Sam Young
  • 2017: Savannah
  • 2016: Jeremy Runnells
  • 2015: John Dehlin
  • 2014: Kate Kelly
  • 2013: J. Seth Anderson and Michael Ferguson
  • 2012: David Tweede
  • 2011: Joanna Brooks
  • 2010: Monica Bielanko
  • 2009: Walter Kirn

Other Cool Sites!

WasMormon.org
©2025 Main Street Plaza | WordPress Theme by SuperbThemes