Skip to content
Main Street Plaza

A Community for Anyone Interested in Mormonism.

Main Street Plaza

A Community for Anyone Interested in Mormonism.

In addition to touring the temple…

aerin64, January 13, 2009January 13, 2009

I heard this story on Friday on NPR.

I support the Utah LDS church’s movement towards openness and honesty.

I admit, this effort seems a little like a drop in the ocean. Yet I have to acknowledge the attempt. One of the comments Quentin Cook made was that they were “surprised” by the reaction from the public during Romney’s campaign and with prop. 8. While I respect some of the surprise, I can’t say I’m shocked by the secretive perception that many non LDS have. Even some active LDS I know are shocked to find out certain things about their religion’s history and its doctrine. It’s easy to not take the pulse of current cultural opinion and trends when you live not “of the world” and spend most of your time in an office building in Salt Lake City (surrounded by yes men). Many active and former LDS (throughout the world) could give the leadership lots of input about choices and attitudes that could be adjusted. But I digress.

One thing that would lead to greater openness would be full financial disclosure. This would mean that each person or ward could understand exactly where their tithing funds were being spent. Also – any investments or business that are owned or operated by LDS Inc. would be disclosed.

I mentioned this proposal before, in this post My Legislative Suggestion that will never go anywhere. I think it’s important for members of an organization to feel like they have a voice. That they understand what the organization (that they are members of) is doing and spending their money on. Considering the ongoing debacle over Prop. 8, this type of disclosure is even more important. I paid tithing as a child. I have no idea where that money was spent or where it went. It could have supported the upkeep on the church building. It could have paid for imported wood and gold inlay on a new temple. In the end – I have no idea. And members who contribute thousands of dollars per year also have no idea.

What other suggestions can you think of to dispel the secret nature of the Utah LDS church? I’m thinking of suggestions in addition to finances and an open and frank discussion of the past?

Priesthood Public Relations Tithing

Post navigation

Previous post
Next post

Related Posts

So you’re a… umm… ok

September 21, 2011September 22, 2011

One viewer’s reaction to an “I’m a Mormon”/Mormon.org video*: Folks be gettin’ annoyed by LDS-sponsored YouTube ads. Mormon YouTube ads engage with social media to advertise their religion, an online version of the door-to-door campaigns conducted by the Jehovahs witnesses. The only difference is that you can no longer shut…

Read More

Utah bankruptcy isn’t about Mormons?

June 25, 2009April 1, 2021

I caught this article while reading my science news this morning: Bankruptcy Rates Reflect Policy, Not People. Basically what the article says is that the different rates of bankruptcy filings by state are not due to spending patterns or characteristics of the people in those states but rather policies regarding…

Read More

Hi, my name is Nagla, and I’m a Muslim

September 1, 2010May 17, 2011

Nagla and her crew obviously shot this on a slightly tighter budget than what Josh and Aron had to work with. Not that I begrudge our dueling skateboarders the benefit of the best production values that Mormon and Scientologist money can buy (Josh and Aron deserve no less, considering that…

Read More

Comments (7)

  1. Hellmut says:
    January 13, 2009 at 11:20 am

    Financial disclosure would be the single most effective reform of Mormonism. A little accountability would go a long way to stabilize the LDS Church.

    Of course, the brethren won’t do it voluntarily but it would be good for their institution. The government saved the Church from itself during reconstruction and the new deal.

    May be, that needs to happen again.

  2. rebecca says:
    January 13, 2009 at 12:10 pm

    I think making the temple rites known and not wearing weird underwear with secret symbols would make people a lot less wary of them. Of course, the secrecy of those things is so central to the practices of the church that…not going to happen. And I wouldn’t expect it to, or really care if it did. I just think people wouldn’t be so weirded out by the Mormons if they talked about “sacred” things.

    My brother stopped paying tithing, and instead buys books and donates them with that money. I think that’s a FANTASTIC idea.

  3. Andrew S says:
    January 13, 2009 at 5:22 pm

    I remember reading an article about a former member (or maybe she was still a member) who went to a…:( I’m sorry, I don’t remember the details…well, she had gone to another church and was kinda amazed that they were deliberated openly about what kind of language they should use for some proposal they were doing…it was a relatively open meeting where women — and not just men — were allowed to input.

    Well, I pretty much botched that synopsis up, getting rid of any details that could help anyone find this story, but that’s what this post reminded me of.

  4. aerin says:
    January 13, 2009 at 6:31 pm

    Andrew #3- a business meeting?

    I have to say, there is a point where some (only some) discussions about language and the language used get a little redundent. But I won’t disagree that some terms are limiting.

    I would say – I’ve found amazing openness in almost every organization I’ve been in since LDS, Inc. – including the publicly traded company I currently work for. And that’s saying a lot.

  5. Hellmut says:
    January 13, 2009 at 9:14 pm

    In terms of centralization of power, the LDS Church is an extreme, at least in the western world. We are even more authoritarian than the Roman Catholic Church, which is quite an accomplishment.

  6. chanson says:
    January 14, 2009 at 10:56 am

    I think making the temple rites known and not wearing weird underwear with secret symbols would make people a lot less wary of them.

    I though that knowing what’s in the temple rites makes them seem more weird. If you don’t know, you can give them the benefit of the doubt that their secret ritual is actually something really cool…

  7. rebecca says:
    January 14, 2009 at 11:33 am

    chanson — Well, yeah, that’s true. They do kind of make people get squinchy eyed. But the fact that they REFUSE to answer any questions or talk about it I think really weirds people out. Then when people eventually do find out what goes on (if they care enough to look into it), they’re even more weirded out. If people had explained it in the first place I think it would often come off as more quirky than weird. I mean, no one has a real problem with nuns and priests wearing crazy clothes and being chaste for life (in theory, anyway). The difference is that they’re public about it.

    Not that I think Mormons should start wearing their underwear on the outside or anything…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Mormon Alumni Association Books

Latest Comments:

  1. Tent revival: ur doin it rong | MORIAH JOVAN on Mormonism = evangelical megachurch wannabes?July 25, 2025

    […] Hat tip Main Street Plaza. […]

  2. chanson on LDS vs LGBTQ:  Nathan Kitchen sheds false binariesApril 16, 2025

    The haiku at the end is lovely. Sounds like a great book!

  3. Donna Banta on LDS vs LGBTQ:  Nathan Kitchen sheds false binariesApril 14, 2025

    I imagine anyone who has tried to change the church from within will identify with Kitchen's story. I especially like…

  4. Johnny Townsend on LDS vs LGBTQ:  Nathan Kitchen sheds false binariesApril 14, 2025

    This was a painful review to read. For many years, I held the same hope, that the LDS church would…

  5. LDS vs LGBTQ:  Nathan Kitchen sheds false binaries – Main Street Plaza on It’s Time to Vote for the 2024 Brodie Awards!!!April 14, 2025

    […] sincere acceptance is not a priority. Fortunately, this is what he exemplifies in his memoir, the Brodie-nominated Boughs of…

8: The Mormon Proposition Acceptance of Gays Add new tag Affirmation angry exmormon awards Book Reviews BYU comments Conformity Dallin H. Oaks DAMU disaffected mormon underground Dustin Lance Black Ex-Mormon Exclusion policy Excommunicated exmormon faith Family feminism Gay Gay Love Gay Marriage Gay Relationships General Conference Happiness Homosexual Homosexuality LDS LGBT LGBTQ Link Bomb missionaries Modesty Mormon Mormon Alumni Association Mormonism motherhood peace politics Polygamy priesthood ban Sunstone temple

Awards

William Law X-Mormon of the Year:

  • 2023: Adam Steed
  • 2022: David Archuleta
  • 2021: Jeff T. Green
  • 2020: Jacinda Ardern
  • 2019: David Nielsen
  • 2018: Sam Young
  • 2017: Savannah
  • 2016: Jeremy Runnells
  • 2015: John Dehlin
  • 2014: Kate Kelly
  • 2013: J. Seth Anderson and Michael Ferguson
  • 2012: David Tweede
  • 2011: Joanna Brooks
  • 2010: Monica Bielanko
  • 2009: Walter Kirn

Other Cool Sites!

WasMormon.org
©2025 Main Street Plaza | WordPress Theme by SuperbThemes